Business Case Studies, Macroeconomics Case Study, US Financial Crisis, Keynesian Economics

print page
Tell A Friend
Bookmark
 

Case Categories

Macroeconomics Case Study

IBS CDC IBS CDC IBS CDC IBS CDC RSS Feed
Case Title:

US Financial Crisis: Is Keynesian Economics Still Relevant?

Publication Year : 2010

Authors: Akshaya Kumar Jena, Saradhi Kumar Gonela

Industry: General Business

Region:US

Case Code: MEBE0007

Teaching Note:  Available

Structured Assignment:  Available

Buy This Case Study
OR





Abstract:
When the US citizens were rollicking in the soaring optimism of the roaring twenties of the last century, suddenly their economy was caught off-guard in a scary crash at the penultimate year that decade. As it lingered on long, the distilled essence of the reigning classical economics made no sense in that spooky scenario. It stood to ridicule as stark actuality stared to gobble the theory. But no credible alternative framework was in place to lean upon. During those darkening days, in came J.M. Keynes with the bombshell of a book The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. It not only demolished many a classical myth such as paradox of thrift, supply creates its own demand, and wage cut expands employment and so on, but also presented a cogent doctrine to lift the economy from slump. Keynes’ brilliant insight could detect that instability is the name of the game in a capitalist economy; and to fight it, the artillery is government intervention – but not to the extent that the Marxists recommended for. The case runs a whole hog of logic and reality as regards efficacy of Keynesian medication when countries are afflicted with economic downturn. As the US financial crisis of 2008 – traced to the housing bubble – cries out for solution and the bailout plan put in place in the name of Keynesianism seems at best half-cock in success, the relevance of Keynes – who guns for direct government intervention – resonates in the powerhouse of policymakers. Whether Keynesian economics is a real remedy for the downslide or whether it is worse than the malady is a stimulating question that the case poses and ponders over. Whether Keynesianism suffers from the ‘Broken Window Fallacy’ or it breaks free the economies of the world from the shackles of slump; whether it masks a debt-driven festering bubble in the underbelly of yet another bigger bubble propped up by yet higher leverage or it truly re-stirs the resources that have gone into forced idleness are the aspects discussed and dissected. In so doing, the case revives the debate apropos the relevance of the great economist even 6 decades after his demise. The counterfoil provided by monetarism, supply-side economics and the Austrian school of thought only sharpens the issue.

Pedagogical Objectives:

advertisement

    Executive Interviews

  • David ConklinDavid Conklin

    David Conklin, is a professor at the Richard Ivey School of Business
    Speaks on Government and Business
  • Lord Meghnad DesaiLord Meghnad Desai

    Lord Meghnad Desai, is an Indian-born British economist and Labor politician
    Speaks on Government and Business
  • Vijay GovindarajanVijay Govindarajan

    Vijay Govindarajan, is widely regarded as one of the world’s leading experts on strategy and innovation
    Speaks on Reverse Innovation
  • View All Executive Interviews»




Contact us: IBS Case Development Centre, Survey No. 156/157, Dontanapalli Village, Shankerpalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad-501504, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA, Phone: 08147-236660/61/62/72, Fax: 08147-236653,E-mail: casehelpdesk@ibsindia.org

©2003-2013 IBS Case Development Centre. All rights reserved. | Careers | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Disclosure | Site Map xml sitemap