Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Revisited after Twenty-five Years![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection »Business Ethics Case Studies ![]() Please note: This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source. |
||||||||
"Twenty-five years is a long time to wait for Dow and Union Carbide to right this devastating wrong, and it's even longer when the tragedy keeps on giving. Because site contamination has still not been adequately contained, nor cleaned up, the poisons continue to pollute the groundwater that more than 30,000 people rely on for drinking water. Again, how is it that a corporation gets away with this?" 1 - Tonya Hennessey, Project Director, CorpWatch2, in December 2009. "Bhopal is not just an incident of industrial disaster and human suffering from the last century. It is very much an issue of the present century of corporate accountability, peoples' rights, and government responsibility. The lack of mandatory laws and norms governing multinationals, legal complexities, and government failures are serious obstacles in ensuring justice for the people of Bhopal, and for the victims of corporate complicity in crimes against environment, peoples' lives, and safety." 3 - Amnesty International4, in November 2009.
Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Revisited after Twenty-five Years - Next Page>>
1] Tonya Hennessey, "25 Years and Still Fighting for Justice: When Will Dow Chemical Clean Up its Poisonous Legacy in Bhopal," www.corpwatch.org, December 14, 2009.
|
Case Studies Links:-
Case Studies,
Short Case Studies,
Simplified Case Studies.
Other Case Studies:-
Multimedia Case Studies,
Cases in Other Languages.
Business Reports Link:-
Business Reports.
Books:-
Textbooks,
Work Books,
Case Study Volumes.